What is the HDI of Myanmar?
0.583
Myanmar’s HDI value for 2019 is 0.583— which put the country in the medium human development category—positioning it at 147 out of 189 countries and territories.
Which country has the highest human development in HD 2011?
___ The Human Development Index 2011 – going beyond income
| Human Development Index – Top 50 Countries with high human development in 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|
| HDI rank | Country | Life expectancy at birth |
| 1 | Norway | 81.1 |
| 2 | Australia | 81.9 |
| 3 | Netherlands | 80.7 |
What is India’s HDI 2011?
0.547
According to HDR 2011, the HDI for India was 0.547 in 2011 with an overall global ranking of 134(out of the 187 countries) compared to 119 (out of 169 countries) as per HDR 2010.
Which country hold better Human Development Index rank among the following countries in 2014?
Norway tops the HDI ranking, followed by Australia, Switzerland and Denmark.
What is Bangladesh’s HDI?
0.632
Bangladesh’s HDI value for 2019 is 0.632— which put the country in the medium human development category—positioning it at 133 out of 189 countries and territories.
What is the HDI of Singapore?
0.938
Singapore’s HDI value for 2019 is 0.938— which put the country in the very high human development category—positioning it at 11 out of 189 countries and territories. The rank is shared with Finland. Between 1990 and 2019, Singapore’s HDI value increased from 0.721 to 0.938, an increase of 30.1 percent.
What is a good HDI score?
Countries ranked from 1 to 66 in the year 2019 are considered to be of very high HDI, ranked 67 to 119 are considered to be of high HDI, ranked 120 to 156 are considered to be of medium HDI, and ranked 157 to 189 are considered to be of low HDI.
Is HDI a good measure of development?
The HDI (Human Development Index) is a way to measure well being within a country. The HDI is a very useful measure of development because it includes economic and social indicators which helps reduce any anomalies.
What is China’s HDI?
0.761
China’s HDI value for 2019 is 0.761— which put the country in the high human development category— positioning it at 85 out of 189 countries and territories.
Who scored better rank than India in HDI in 2013?
Russia secured the highest rank at 57, followed by Brazil at 79 and China at 91.
Which country has highest and lowest HDI rank?
Global Data Lab also provides data on the HDI of Somalia, putting it at 0.361, the lowest in the world, though data for Syria is unavailable….Countries.
| Rank | 2019 data (2020 report) | 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Nation | Norway | |
| HDI | 2019 data (2020 report) | 0.957 |
| Average annual growth (2010–2019) | 0.20% |
Why HDI of Bangladesh is low?
Bangladesh’s HDI for 2019 is 0.632. However, when the value is discounted for inequality, the HDI falls to 0.478, a loss of 24.4 percent due to inequality in the distribution of the HDI dimension indices. Nepal and Pakistan show losses due to inequality of 25.9 percent and 31.1 percent, respectively.
What is Myanmar’s HDI?
Myanmar has achieved a new status as a medium-ranked member of the human development index (HDI), according to a 2016 report by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) this week. Myanmar was placed at 145 out of 188 countries, with an HDI of 0.556.
Is Myanmar’s policy mix ‘right’ for Human Development?
“The lower rate of growth of the HDI score in recent years emphasises the importance for the government of Myanmar and its development partners to get the policy mix ‘right’ to further advance human development in the country going forward,” said Thomas Kring, economic advisor to the UNDP.
What is the latest Human Development Index (HDI)?
The latest HDI report is from 2011 with emphasis on Sustainability and Equity, titled: A Better Future for All. The three Human Development Indicators are: 1. Life Expectancy Index (LEI): Life expectancy at birth (in years); 2.
What is the 2011 Human Development Report all about?
The 2011 Human Development Report argues that the urgent global challenges of sustainability and equity must be addressed together – and identifies policies on the national and global level that could spur mutually reinforcing progress towards these interlinked goals.